There’s a lot of talk about Google Glass and legalities these days. Let’s look at some of those issues, starting with a description of the device.
What Is Google Glass?
Basically, it is a wearable computer with a camera, microphone and display in the form of eye glasses that the wearer manipulates through voice commands, taps and even winking. The camera sees what the wearer sees, and the wearer can:
- Record video, audio and photo.
- Use GPS for location tracking and retrieving directions.
- Connect to a smartphone for placing calls, texting and email.
- The wearer’s smartphone.
It’s bad enough that other people cannot always tell if they are being recorded by Google Glass wearers, but also everything recorded is stored on Google’s servers “in the cloud.” And you know that everything on Google’s servers belongs to Google, right? Wanted to check because drafted email messages stored on Google’s servers were the reason the United States’ former director of the CIA, David Petraeus, resigned in 2012. Petraeus didn’t know that drafts of his emails to his lover were Google’s property.
Facial Recognition Built Into Glass?
According to the Electronic Privacy Information Center, it’s likely that facial recognition software will be built into Google Glass in the near future. That means a wearer can look at you and the Glass’s facial recognition software will “compute” your identity, then dredge up all kinds of information about you, such as your Twitter news feed, Facebook page, which legal blogs you read, and so on.
There currently is a technology patent for a detector that blurs people’s features when a portable camera is in the vicinity. Great, a software product that can thwart Google Glass, right? Sorry, but no. Google is currently seeking a patent for a contact lens Google Glass that would escape any public detection.
While seeking this patent, Google stated on its blog it “won’t add facial recognition features to our products without having strong privacy protections in place.” Hmm, wonder what those strong privacy protections are. Not so long ago, 38 states, including the District of Columbia, reached a settlement for $7 million with Google over its illegal collection of data from wireless networks, including private WiFi networks of residential Internet users.
Banning Google Glass
Businesses are starting to ban Google Glasses being worn on their premises for liability and security issues. There are also concerns over wearers illegally recording others without their permission in two-party consent states, as well as wearers violating the Wiretap Act.
Backlashes to “Glassholes”
There have been violent altercations between people not liking their privacy being violated by disrespectful Glass wearers (by the way, the moniker being used for a disrespectful Glass wearer is Glasshole — no, I’m not making that up). Recently, bar patrons in San Francisco and New York have attacked Glass wearers who appeared to be recording others without their permission.
Restaurant Owner Takes Heat for Banning Google Glass
When a restaurant, Feast, in the East Village kicked out a female patron who refused to take off her Google Glass, hundreds of “Glass groupies” rallied against the restaurant, accusing it of being discriminatory against “technology.” Feast’s owner, Brian Ghaw, refused to apologize for kicking out the woman. His customers, Ghaw said, “felt uncomfortable about having somebody who could potentially videotape them.” Ghaw’s restaurant remains a No Google Glass zone to this day.
What Kind of Places Are Banning Google Glass?
According to an article in SEJ, bars are the number entity to ban Google Glass. To read the other nine top spots, check out the article “Top 10 Places That Have Banned Google Glass.”
Interestingly enough, law firms aren’t on that list. Yet, anyway.
Shaun Kaufman Law: 303-309-0430
Latest posts by Kaufman (see all)
- Google Glass: Privacy Issues and Backlashes to Glassholes - October 5, 2014
- A Lawyer’s Primer for Writers: From Crimes to Courtrooms – Book Review by Festivale Magazine - October 2, 2014
- Former ATF Agent Jay Dobyns Wins His Case Against the Government - September 19, 2014
How Can We Help You?Call Shaun Kaufman Law at 303-309-0430. We are happy to offer a free, initial phone consultation regarding your case. Or fill out the below contact form, and Shaun Kaufman will get back to you as soon as possible.
Subscribe via Email to Shaun Kaufman Law Posts
Recent Popular Posts by Shaun Kaufman
- Sartorial Tips from a Lawyer: What to Wear to Court As my friends and family know, I'm a decades-long fan…
- Colorado Temporary vs. Permanent Protection Orders There are two forms of protection orders (commonly called restraining…
- Should You Lie or Not Talk to the Police? Can I get into trouble if I lie to the…
- Don’t Be a Cop Magnet: Top 10 Reasons Police Pull Over… It's fairly easy to get pulled over while you're driving.…
- After the DUI Arrest, What Happens Next? After you are taken into custody for DUI, you will…
- Sentencing: Tips for Preparing a Mitigation Package Sentencing is important in many criminal defense cases. Understand that…
- What Happens When the Police Shoot a Citizen In today's blog, I'm discussing the procedures used by police…
Shaun Kaufman Law serves clients across…
Denver Metro area and throughout Colorado, the Denver Tech Center, Golden, Brighton, Littleton, Boulder, Lakewood, Longmont, Englewood, Arvada, Fort Collins, Greeley, Aurora, Evergreen, Lakewood, Broomfield, Castle Rock, Parker, Highlands Ranch, Centennial, Glendale, Louisville, Lone Tree, Aspen, Vail, Breckenridge, Steamboat Springs, Cherry Creek, Pueblo, Black Hawk, Georgetown, Eagle, Carbonale,,El Jebel, Leadville, Glenwood Springs, Granby, Grand Lake, Durango, Pagosa Springs, Silverton,Telluride, Ouray, Delta, Gunnison, Lake City, Walden, Loveland. Rifle, Meeker, Rangely, Central City, Salida, Westcliffe, Canon City, Fairplay, Sheridan, Creede, Del Norte, Centennial, Littleton, Castle Rock, Parker, Kiowa. Broomfield, and all communities of The Foothills, The Eastern Plains and the Front Range, Trinidad, Walsenburg and Aguilar.